Integrity of creative image for composing an analysis of literary work

Integrity of creative image for composing an analysis of literary work

Consciousness can work as a psyche, therefore the psyche being a consciousness. As being a basis, the prerequisites for artistic imagination, these sides are inseparably in principle. In science, we count on a consciousness that runs with essences, wanting to eliminate emotions and experiences. In art and literary works, emotion contains thought, in thought – emotion. The image is just a synthesis of consciousness and psyche, ideas and feelings.

What’s the foundation for artistic imagination in literary analysis?

This seems to be the true foundation of artistic imagination, that will be feasible only because awareness and psyche, being autonomous spheres, are at the exact same time inextricably connected. It really is impractical to decrease the image to your idea (into the aim of the principles): we ought to distract ourselves from emotions. To lessen the image to direct experience means to “not notice” the turnover associated with psyche, being able to be fraught with idea.

However, the integrity associated with the image isn’t just a sensually perceived idea (concept). The image just isn’t yet a means associated with existence of simultaneously a few principles (a system of ideas). The image is fundamentally multivalued, it simultaneously contains several aspects. Technology can not pay for this. Ideas decrease an object phenomenon that is( to at least one aspect, as much as one moment, deliberately abstracting from all others. Science explores phenomena analytically with subsequent synthesis, practicing most of the brief moments of interrelation. Art, but, believes with regards to the definitions. More over, the existence of the sum of definitions is a vital condition for the “life” for the image that is artistic. It’s impossible to determine what could be the true meaning, what is the “more crucial” meaning.

Concept of artistic concept of literary work

Theoretically, artistic content can be paid down to a medical, up to a logically developed system of concepts. But in practice this can be impossible, which is not necessary. We have been working with the abyss of meanings. Even within the issue of the appearance of new semantic overtones, new deep definitions, about “self-production” of definitions in classical works. Since a work may be comprehended towards the end only when absolutely the rational unfolding of images is realized, it could be argued that the data of an extremely creative work is an endless procedure.

Therefore, the image is indecomposable. Its perception can only be holistic: as an experience of idea, as a sensually recognized essence. For this reason, the analysis that is scientific of tasks are a “double relative” cognition of artistic integrity: besides that the inexhaustibility of definitions can’t be paid off to a method, with such cognition, the adequate perception of feelings – empathy – is left from the brackets.

The maximum complete perception for the object that is aesthetic constantly multifaceted:

  • empathy,
  • co-creation,
  • way of integrity through medical dialectical logic.

What gives the richness up to a work that is literary?Read more